![]() ![]() Furthermore, we restricted a detailed analysis to those articles published within the last 5 years ( n = 69). On average, the studies used 19.64 criteria throughout their hierarchical levels. Most studies were from Asia (almost 30 %), followed by the US (25.6 %). The number of studies applying AHP has increased since 2005. The systematic review resulted in 121 articles. MethodsĪ systematic literature review was conducted by searching the Pubmed and Web of Science databases for articles with the following keywords in their titles or abstracts: “Analytic Hierarchy Process,” “Analytical Hierarchy Process,” “multi-criteria decision analysis,” “multiple criteria decision,” “stated preference,” and “pairwise comparison.” In addition, we developed reporting criteria to indicate whether the authors reported important aspects and evaluated the resulting studies’ reporting. The slowly increasing application of the AHP was the motivation for this study to explore the current state of its methodology in the healthcare context. The weight for each criterion and alternative are judged in pairwise comparisons and priorities are calculated by the Eigenvector method. The AHP disaggregates a complex decision problem into different hierarchical levels. Dozens of books have been written on the subject along with more than five thousand published articles in a diversity of languages.The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), developed by Saaty in the late 1970s, is one of the methods for multi-criteria decision making. Thousands of applications around the world have been made using the AHP, not only by researchers but by practitioners as well, particularly those who allocate resources to projects, to vendors, and to military operations. ![]() It is validated in practice when actual measurements exist or when answers can be derived probabilistically. The AHP/ANP use core mathematics to derive priorities by making comparisons using the idea of dominance both for criteria, subcriteria and alternatives. Its most general framework called the Analytic Network Process (ANP) applies to decision making with dependence and feedback and with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks synthesized using strategic criteria with sensitivity applied in determining the stability of the outcome. It is used throughout the world in a wide variety of decision making situations, in the fields such as government, business, industry, healthcare, and education. Saaty at the Wharton School of Business of the University of Pennsylvania, USA in the 1970s and has been extensively studied and refined since then. Rather than prescribing a "correct" decision, the AHP helps people to determine the one based on mathematics and human psychology, it was developed by Thomas L. It provides a comprehensive and rational framework for structuring a problem, for representing and quantifying its elements, for relating those elements to overall goals, and for evaluating alternative courses of actions. Making good decisions is one of the most important things we can do our organizations' survival and success and our own well-being depend on our decision-making ability. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a structured method for helping people deal with complex decisions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |